Two recent Danish political cases where the evidence was in plain sight for months or years before crisis. Both stories assembled entirely from published journalism and public registries — the same sources Previo's screening draws from.
The underlying findings — three material issues across bankruptcy records, media, and prior regulatory contact — had been in public records for months. No private data required. Just systematic screening against the sources that were already there.
Workplace abuse, signature forgery, undeclared benefits, and a pattern of senior dismissals across three institutions. Expelled from the parliamentary group within a year. The earliest red flag dated to 2009 and was always public.
All information presented in both studies is drawn from published journalism by Danish national media and publicly accessible government registries. No private or non-public data was used. Both candidates are real; their names, roles, and the cited events are matters of public record. The studies illustrate what systematic screening would have surfaced — not a speculative assessment of the individuals.
If you would like us to run a sample screening against a candidate profile you're considering — with appropriate consent — get in touch.